Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2011 March 20

< 2011 March 19

2011 March 20

2011 March 21 >

Back to main feedback page

Index of all pages

User:Nolabob/Hap Glaudi

As a beginning Wikipedian, I'd appreciate some commentary from experienced Wikipedians on this, my first article in the Wikipedia.

Nolabob (talk) 02:03, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "system" fills in a title for a page. All you need is the subject boldfaced. I removed the extra stuff.

All your inline references to external sources need to be enclosed in "ref" tags. I put tags around the item at the end of the first paragraph. It needs some further work; let me describe.

Your references would be both better documented and, on the Wikipedia pages, better presented, if you used the templates at Wikipedia:Citation templates, namely "cite web". I filled in one in your article draft so you can see how to do it. I thought the article was well written and well constructed. Tkotc (talk) 05:44, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adam O'Rourke Ice Hockey Article Review

Reviews, questions and comments please. Karen

Copkaren (talk) 07:46, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:LazyLilac/Arthur Charles Evans CBE

Hi, I have set this page up because the person is my Grandfather who died last week. I wasn't sure whether I could do this, but I have found some sources which I have included. I wonder whether someone could tell me what I have done is ok and whether I could make it live? There are some dates I need to check, and there maybe further information once I have spoken to my Mum.

Thanks, Jo

LazyLilac (talk) 14:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I've gone and fixed some formatting, removed some POV (point-of-view bias), etc. The article as it currently stands has only one real issue: it needs at least one or two more reputable sources (WP:RS) to verify notability. Biographies, in particular, need some evidence that the individual's notability has been documented by some reputable authority (academic or news works being the most common). Note that nobody is necessarily denying that Evans is notable, just stating that evidence of notability, in the form of unaffiliated people recognising him, is the standard to meet. Do you have any news articles that mention Evans, or any books which verify some basic facts about his having been a Stalag prisoner (in addition to his own book)? Again, we're not trying to attack the article, rather trying to help you make it unassailably well-documented prior to publication. Feel free to write back with any questions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:13, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your reply. This is a work in progress at the moment, and there is very little evidence online about him. I have this news story scanned in on the Facebook page, http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=111341985575941&set=pu.109469855763154&theater, could I use this as a reference of some sort? I have also taken some further information from the back of his book, have I referenced this correctly? There will be an obituary in the local paper this coming week, which will hopefully go on the newspaper website. I'll wait until I have some more details before I make it live. I've now added the London Gazette link to show his CBE. Also another website which gives his name on the list of prisoners. LazyLilac (talk) 17:09, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can reference offline sources as well, like books and non-online newspapers. For a newspaper, put the name of the writer, name of article, date of article and name of newspaper.--Physics is all gnomes (talk) 12:01, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The obituary should be pretty helpful, and if it's online all the easier for folks to link to it to read more. One minor point: some obituaries tend to be flowery or laudatory, just make sure not to carry any of that bias over to the article. Good work thus far, and kudos for your quick pick-up of the policies and conventions here. MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your helpful advice both, I am thinking of putting the obituary on his website, so maybe I can reference it that way. Otherwise I might ask the newspaper to put it online for me. What is the etiquette about undoing changes someone else has made? Obviously as a family member I kind of know when something is correct or not, so I just want to make sure I'm not doing something I shouldn't if I remove or change an edit? Thanks :) LazyLilac (talk) 09:48, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John J. Coughlin

The Reverend John J. Coughlin entry represents my first attempt to write a Wikipedia article. I have spent hours trying to "wikify" and "clean it up" prior to requesting help. I do not know what else to do with the article to remove the two notes at the top of the page. Please let me know your suggestions to make this article better. The only thing I can think of is adding more citations. Many thanks to you for your assistance.

76.94.43.34 (talk) 20:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Two things:

You should remove the ALL CAPS text. Just type the names of the books or journals in normal title case.
Lists should use proper list formatting. This means that you start every list item with an asterisk (*) and leave no blank lines between the items. If you edit this section, you can see how I turned these two items into a bulleted list.

If you do those two things, I think you will be justified in removing the templates from the top of the article. WhatamIdoing (talk) 05:43, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado 1870-2000

I created an article about the book, Colorado 1870-2000, which was a collaboration with the modern photographer, John Fielder, and a 19th century photographer - W.H. Jackson. Both photographers already have pages on Wikipedia. This book is extremely significant to Colorado history and to Colorado residents. This book (and its sequels) are well known to Colorado residents and regarded very highly. Coloradans are proud of their frontier past as well as the environment/nature. John Fielder is extremely well known amongst photographers and is well known in Colorado. His project for this book reminded Coloradans about their frontier history.

Daisy3518 (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom Kerry Gaels

Could someone please review my article and provide some feedback as it's the first one I have done??

Thanks in advance

Secretarykkg (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bimcurator/Mayflower steam tug Comments invited on revised page

Please give me some feedback on these revisions.

Bimcurator (talk) 23:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work and a great addition to wikipedia :) I like articles on unusual subjects like this. I think the article could be improved by more use of inline citation, as it would make it easier for readers to verify and follow up on different bits of the article. But it's up to you really, some would argue inline citation's not necessary on an article this length. Have you thought of nominating it to get a link on the front page via Wikipedia:Did you know? It showcases interesting, well-constructed new articles no more than 5 days old (measured from when they're moved into the article mainspace). --Physics is all gnomes (talk) 14:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]